Drug Delivery Technologies
LAURIAD®
Scientific
Papers
Miconazole
Lauriad® : Loramyc®
Lead Product:
- A Once-A-Day 50mg Mucoadhesive Buccal Tablet
Rationale:
- Early and extended release of miconazole for a pressure
increase on the fungi at the infection site
- Once a day
- Non-absorbed active molecule: no drug-drug interactions
- Large spectrum and resistance issue prevention first line
positioning before antifungal systemic use
Indication:
- Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis (full indication
in the US and immunocompromised patients and chronic diseases
in Europe)
- First Line Local Treatment
Development Status:
- Registered in France in October 2006
- Price reimbursement obtained in France
- European Mutual recognition Procedure to start in 2007
- US IND Allowed 3Q 2005
- US Phase 3 Clinical Trial ongoing
Epidemiology
In Oncology:
The risk of candidiasis is particularly high in patients
undergoing radiotherapy or who suffer from neutropenia.
The risk of oral candidiasis is also linked with local radiotherapy
and tissue insult (frequently 6 cycles of radiotherapy with
risk at each cycle).
A high risk of mucositis is associated with the nature of
chemotherapy (5 FU/ Methotrexate/ Xeloda/Caelix) with a risk
of candidiasis in 100% of treated patients.
Other chemotherapy regimens (platinums, taxanes) are associated
with a candidiasis risk of 50%. For example, all digestive
cancer candidates with exposure to 5FU are at high risk of
contracting candidiasis.
Other immune compromised patients:
- HIV patients
- Diabetics
- Patients with rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory bowel
disease
- Chronic corticosteroids or Asthma
- Elderly
Clinical Development Program
The development of miconazole Lauriad tablets began in 1999.
Miconazole is an antifungal molecule, which belongs to the
azole family and acts by inhibiting the ergo sterol synthesis.
This molecule is marketed worldwide and is in particular indicated
in candidiasis infections. It has been extensively described
in the literature and has an established tolerance and efficacy
profile for the treatment of oral and intestinal candidiasis.
Its good tolerance profile is enhanced by the fact that it
has a limited absorption. Of particular importance is its
broad spectrum activity against different species of Candida
including Candida albicans, C. krusei, C. pseudotropicalis
and C. parapsilosis.
In sum, miconazole, was chosen as it:
- Possesses a good efficacy profile and is effective against
Candida albicans and C. krusei, C. pseudotropicalis and
C. parapsilosis
- Is indicated in oral and gastrointestinal candidiasis
in the EU and many other countries in the world
- Has a good safety profile
- Has a low drug interaction profile
- Has a minimum absorption profile
The rationale for development of an extended-release bioadhesive
buccal tablet is based on reaching a constant antifungal salivary
concentration, increased contact time with effective concentrations
in the oral cavity (above the minimum inhibitory concentration
[MIC]) in order to increase efficacy and reduce the risk of
resistance, and to provide a once-daily administration to
improve patient compliance.
The bioadhesive tablet was designed to be applied once a day
to maintain adequate miconazole saliva levels for effective
treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis. It is planned that
this application will be submitted to the U.S. FDA as a 505(b)(2)
NDA, based on the extensive historical use of miconazole in
the United States and abroad for over 30 years for the topical
treatment of fungal infections.
A pharmacokinetic study with miconazole Lauriad® tablets
was conducted by BioAlliance in healthy volunteers. The study
was designed as a single-center, randomized, cross-over design,
performed in
18 healthy men and women, 18 -35 years of age, to evaluate
the miconazole pharmacokinetic parameters in saliva and the
tolerability of a 50 and 100 mg buccal tablet compared with
miconazole gel. Each of the 18 subjects received the 3 treatments
followed by a washout period of 7 days. Miconazole Lauriad®
bioadhesive tablets were administered as a single dose. Miconazole
oral gel, the comparator, was administered in the oral cavity,
125 mg 3 times per day, on the study treatment day. Pharmacokinetic
parameters, as well as the local tolerability of the buccal
tablets, were evaluated. Duration of exposure was much greater
for the bioadhesive tablets compared with the oral gel. Saliva
pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent
with a once-a-day application. Plasma concentrations were
essentially undetectable. The benefits of the miconazole Lauriad®
tablet, compared with the miconazole oral gel, included decreased
systemic exposure to miconazole, an extended exposure of the
oral mucosa to miconazole, simplified treatment regimen, and
improved tolerability, all of which should lead to improved
patient compliance.
Based on the results of the pharmacokinetic study, the 50
mg miconazole Lauriad® tablet was selected for further
evaluation in clinical trials. This decision was based on
salivary concentrations, duration of exposure greater than
the MIC (1 µg/mL), and better local tolerability due
to the smaller size of the 50mg tablet.
A supportive Phase 3 study of miconazole Lauriad® for
the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis was conducted in
25 HIV positive patients at 11 clinical sites in France. An
analysis based on a group-sequential, response adaptive trial
design based on a success rate of 70% allowed the trial, originally
designed for 60 patients, to be completed early due to proven
efficacy. Results from this study show clear evidence of efficacy,
with a success rate of 89.5% at Day 7 and 94.7% at Day 15.
A pivotal Phase 3 study has been completed at 36 clinical
sites in France and North Africa as a comparative noninferiority
study versus miconazole gel. This study was an open-label,
multicenter, randomized, and controlled study in 308 patients
with head and neck cancer treated by radiotherapy, including
a blind evaluation of clinical results. This trial was conducted
in patients presenting with candidiasis and suffering from
dry mouth due to radiotherapy, a low level of saliva production
due to severe mucosal alterations caused by radiotherapy.
Given these conditions, the efficacy and the tolerance data
are particularly interesting.
The primary endpoint was clinical efficacy at Day 14 defined
as a complete or partial clinical response evaluated by an
independent blind assessor. The results confirm the non-inferiority
of the miconazole Lauriad® 50mg tablet applied once per
day for 14 days versus miconazole oral gel, 125mg applied
4 times per day for 14 days.
The EU registration dossier (filed Q3 2005) is based on the
CMC dossier, pharmacokinetic data, the clinical results of
the supportive Phase 3 study of oral candidiasis in HIV patients
and the non-inferiority pivotal Phase 3 study in head and
neck cancer patients following radiotherapy.
The Company has obtained marketing authorization in France
in October 2006. Loramyc® has been approved for the treatment
for oropharyngeal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients,
including HIV patients and head or neck cancer patients undergoing
radiotherapy. This is the first step towards obtaining regulatory
approval across Europe under the European Mutual Recognition
Procedure. France will present the application as the reference
Member State in 2007.
Following the allowance of an IND in August 2005, BioAlliance
has started a confirmatory pivotal Phase III clinical efficacy
study in the US, Canada and RSA, in immunocompromised patients,
to evaluate the efficacy and safety of miconazole Lauriad®
tablets compared with Mycelex® (clotrimazole) Troches
in a noninferiority study design. Miconazole gel is not registered
in the U.S., necessitating the use of Mycelex® Troches
as the comparator, currently one of the most commonly used
therapies to treat oropharyngeal candidiasis in immunocompromised
patients.
|